Here are some specific metrics or data points that family offices can use to evaluate the transparency of private debt managers:
-
Disclosure of investment strategy: Family offices can evaluate the transparency of private debt managers by assessing the level of disclosure around their investment strategy. This includes understanding the manager’s approach to sourcing and evaluating investment opportunities, their risk management framework, and their portfolio construction process 1.
- Portfolio holdings: Family offices can evaluate the transparency of private debt managers by reviewing the manager’s portfolio holdings. This includes understanding the types of assets held in the portfolio, the credit quality of those assets, and the diversification of the portfolio 1 .
- Fees: Family offices can evaluate the transparency of private debt managers by understanding the manager’s fee structure. This includes understanding the types of fees charged, the basis for those fees, and how they are calculated 1 .
- Risk management procedures: Family offices can evaluate the transparency of private debt managers by understanding the manager’s risk management procedures. This includes understanding how the manager identifies and manages risks, how they monitor the portfolio, and how they respond to changes in market conditions 2 .
- Reporting: Family offices can evaluate the transparency of private debt managers by reviewing the manager’s reporting to investors. This includes understanding the frequency and quality of reporting, the level of detail provided, and how the manager communicates with investors 3 .
In summary, family offices can use specific metrics and data points, such as disclosure of investment strategy, portfolio holdings, fees, risk management procedures, and reporting, to evaluate the transparency of private debt managers.